EDWARD MILTON CHEN: EDDIE, STEP ASIDE AND RECUSE YOURSELF FROM MY 2255
- MAXX WOLF
- Aug 7
- 5 min read
Updated: Aug 10
Written by Maxx Wolf
Published: August 7, 2026
AND NO JUSTICE FOR ALL
Judge Edward Milton Chen: Tick Tock the Time is Coming to Recuse yourself, Eddie.
Let’s start with the two-point issue. In 2023, the United States Sentencing Commission adopted Amendment 821, changing federal criminal-history rules and later making portions of those changes retroactive.
I qualified. That part was not debatable. I met the criteria that applied to my case, which meant I was legally eligible to have my sentence reduced. Based on the amended calculation, I asked for twenty-one months. Eddie gave me twelve. Nine months left on the table.
Now, legally, eligibility did not force him to give me every month I requested. But I also have something called an appeal, so I appealed. I am already out of prison. I have a life. I have books being written, a website growing, podcasts coming, and plenty of other things to occupy my time.
Do I desperately need those nine months today? No. Do I still want the record corrected if I believe the law entitled me to a larger reduction? You bet your ass I do. And if seeing MAXX WOLF show up on Eddie’s docket one more time annoys him, consider that a fucking bonus.
There is another reason this matters. Federal law does not automatically turn excess prison time into supervised-release credit, but excess time can matter later when a court considers modifying or terminating supervised release.
If the appellate court determines that I should have received more than twelve months, my lawyer will have another piece of ammunition when the time comes to ask why I should continue serving supervision that may no longer serve any legitimate purpose.
That fight is underway.
Then comes the main event: my 2255. Ask federal prisoners how easy it is to get anywhere with a Section 2255 motion. Meaningful relief is extraordinarily rare—roughly one percent, according to estimates. Yet mine got through the door. It was not simply tossed in the garbage. It moved forward, and now counsel is handling the next stage. When the appeal is finished, we come back to the 2255.
That creates another problem. Eddie.
I do not believe Edward Milton Chen, my Eddie should preside over my 2255. I believe his impartiality can reasonably be questioned based on everything that has already happened in my case.
When the time comes, I intend to put those reasons before him and ask him, professionally and directly, to recuse himself. And Eddie, since Maxx Wolf has never been particularly good at pretending, let me save everybody some time:
I have no respect for you or for the way your racist courtroom handled my case. None.
A robe does not manufacture respect. A title does not manufacture respect. Respect comes from conduct. The law matters. The evidence matters. The record matters. Your title does not change any of them.
So when my 2255 comes back, I am going to ask you to step aside. I will not threaten you, intimidate you, or interfere with your courtroom. I will ask you to recuse yourself through the legal process because I know who you are.
You showed me, and I do not trust you to decide my 2255 impartially. Your robe does not make you impartial. And if you refuse? Then I will decide whether I want to continue pursuing the 2255 before you at all. If I do not, I will instruct my lawyer to seek its withdrawal and dismissal.
Nobody can force me to beg for relief I no longer want.
That is the beautiful part you people still seem unable to understand. Maxx Wolf does not need your permission to speak. He does not need your permission to appeal. He does not need your permission to publish.
He uses the courts when the courts are useful. He uses the record when the record matters. And when something deserves daylight, he turns on the fucking lights.
So yes, Eddie. My name is coming back across your desk. The Amendment 821 appeal comes first, then the 2255. And if seeing my name there annoys you, get used to it.
I intend to use every lawful avenue available to me for as long as I believe there is something worth putting on the record. You had your courtroom. You had your government. You had your version of events.
Now I have mine.
This time, the record gets the last word—and I’m going to make damn sure my voice is in it.
And Eddie, you were right about one thing at sentencing.
I have no fucking remorse.
Not one fucking ounce.
You should have given me eighteen years when you had the chance. You gave me nine. I served four.
Too late.
You fucked up.
These last two stories had to be released. Now Maxx Wolf goes dark for a while. Enjoy the files. I’ll be back. You can Bet on it.
Maxx Wolf doesn’t threaten. Maxx Wolf publishes.
And Maxx Wolf is still saying what he wants.
There is not a fucking thing anyone can lawfully do to stop lawful publication, public records, satire, commentary, and the First Amendment with teeth.
Get used to it.
Maxx Wolf has one job now.
Every day.
Build the website.
Finish the books.
Turn the stories into movies.
Keep publishing.
Keep documenting.
Keep the record alive until every name, every lie, every abuse of power, and every dirty little institutional game has nowhere left to hide.
You wanted silence.
You got Maxx Wolf.
This is the middle finger to all the corrupt government minions, including the fucking Racist
San Francisco courtroom who thought silence was permanent.
Accountability lives at AND NO FUCKING JUSTICE 4 ALL.
MAXX WOLF RATTLES THE CAGES
FUCK THE FEDS
FUCK THE RACIST NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA
EDITOR’S NOTE:
This story is based on Maxx Wolf’s personal experience, court records, filings, appellate proceedings, and his own opinions about Judge Edward Chen and the handling of his case. Any satire, reconstructed dialogue, characterization, or rhetorical language is presented as commentary—not as a verbatim transcript unless specifically identified as such.
This publication does not threaten Judge Chen, encourage harassment, advocate violence, solicit contact, or ask anyone to interfere with any court proceeding. It is criticism of a federal judge, a federal prosecution, and the judicial process as Maxx Wolf experienced it.
Maxx Wolf disputes decisions made in his case, questions Judge Chen’s impartiality, and intends to pursue lawful remedies—including appeal, recusal requests, publication, and public criticism.
Disagreement is not a threat. Criticism is not intimidation. Publication is not obstruction.
Maxx Wolf doesn’t threaten. Maxx Wolf publishes.
— Maxx Wolf
THIS NEVER STOPS.
THE RECORD DOES NOT DISAPPEAR.
AND NO JUSTICE FOR ALL.
Comments